VOTE BOB RYAN

The Many Ethical “Challenges” of Council Member Kate Brandes

On your November 2nd ballot is incumbent Kate Brandes. Did you know that in December 2017 Brandes received a complaint from Rieglesville Constable at her home address about HER MISTREATMENT OF HER DOG. The complaint states that the dog was left outside in the cold and that the dog “cries, barks and shivers, in attempt to escape the conditions.” See complaint for yourself below. Is this true? DOG ABUSE BY COUNCILWOMAN? Go ask Brandes and the Constable who wrote the complaint for yourself.

Brandes Dog Abuse Complaint

We residents would have never known of this DOG ABUSE complaint, but for this: In January 2018, somehow the borough lawyer Dudeck is involved by calling/writing about the DOG ABUSE complaint - and you THE RIEGELSVILLE TAXPAYER PAID $512.50 for it! See all the letters/invoices below.

Borough Solicitor responds to dog abuse complaint
Riegelsville taxpayers pay $512.50 for Dog abuse response

Definitely ask Brandes (and Stinnett who reviews all the solicitor invoices which, for fun, you can hear him say on audio) what is going on and ask them when you’ll be getting your $512.50 tax money back.

Stinnett “I review solicitor invoices” audio

Here’s another: In March 2021, Brandes submits a candidate petition to run for re-election to your borough council. Some of Brandes’ date lines on her petition have a  date of “February 29, 2021.” When? (Go glance at your calendar now).

Turns out February 29, 2021 is not a legal date

[Stop here and realize Brandes - the council member RESPONSIBLE FOR BOROUGH FINANCES, does not have a real day on a legal form she signs and certifies as true and correct under the penalty of 18 Pa.C.S. 4904 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities). You feeling confident about your tax dollars now?]

Brandes then decides to USE THE BOROUGH LAWYER DUDECK AS HER OWN PRIVATE LAWYER to handle how she certified a date that doesn't exist - link below. Then see even more video evidence from borough Zoom meetings of this corruption.  Ask Brandes yourself why she still keeps voting and approving the borough lawyer’s monthly bills for borough work - still in her council position as finance chair - even though he’s also her private lawyer! Also, tell her this public forum is the best forum.

Brandes uses borough solicitor as private lawyer
Video on Brandes voting that you residents can’t use borough law firm
Video of Brandes admitting she employed borough solicitor for private use